Start with a usable evidence record
This page helps a buyer organize the evidence. It does not specify an allowable package weight, a required strap count or a Newton grade rating.
Identify the quantity before comparing values
Ask the supplier to name the reported property. A force and a stress are different quantities; a minimum specification and an average measurement are also different statements.
| Reported item | Information to retain | What remains to check |
|---|---|---|
| Breaking force | Unit, specimen identity and result | Test basis and whether a joint was present |
| Tensile stress | Unit and the cross-section definition used | Measurement method and geometry |
| Elongation | Definition, reference length and result | Test conditions and relevance to the requirement |
| Joined-sample result | Joint process, sample and failure location | Equipment, settings and comparison basis |
Newtons and pounds-force express force. Megapascals express stress. Do not replace a missing property with another number that happens to be available. For example, dimensions alone do not tell you the observed breaking force.
Keep comparable results together
Before comparing candidates, agree how the required evidence will be reported. Ask whether a result is an individual observation, an average or a stated minimum requirement. Retain the sample count, method reference and relevant conditions.
If the records use different definitions, resolve the difference first. A larger number in one brochure does not establish that one product meets your application's requirements better than another.
Use a results register that leaves missing fields visible:
| Field | Candidate A | Candidate B |
|---|---|---|
| Product and batch | To complete | To complete |
| Measured dimensions and method | To complete | To complete |
| Method reference and revision | To complete | To complete |
| Conditions and specimen count | To complete | To complete |
| Required property and unit | To complete | To complete |
| Individual results / reporting basis | To complete | To complete |
| Reviewer and unresolved questions | To complete | To complete |
Give the joint its own evidence
Keep the joined specimen connected to the process used to make it. Record the tool or machine model, relevant settings and observations. Identify whether failure occurred in the joint or elsewhere.
An illustrative ratio shows why the comparison basis matters. If a hypothetical joined specimen breaks at 1,500 N and its comparable unjoined reference at 2,000 N, the ratio is 75%. These are invented arithmetic inputs for explanation, not measurements or acceptance limits. The ratio alone does not define a permissible package load.
When different strap grades or conditions are involved, ask whether the ratio is a valid comparison. Keep the original results as well as the calculated percentage so that a reviewer can see what was divided by what.
Connect the record to the intended decision
Write the purchasing requirement before deciding whether the supplied evidence answers it. An incoming-material check and a package review can have different objectives. Document which result supports which decision.
| Decision | Evidence question |
|---|---|
| Material receiving | Does this delivery match the accepted product and agreed requirements? |
| Equipment review | Was the proposed material evaluated with the intended process? |
| Joint review | Is there a relevant and traceable record for the applied joint? |
| Package review | Have the responsible people assessed the complete package under the intended conditions? |
Do not calculate an allowable pallet mass by multiplying unjoined breaking force by strap count. Keep load, contact points, protection and handling questions with the responsible packaging team.
Request the record for your proposed grade
Ask Newton for the product identifier, applicable method references, relevant results and the scope of the available documents. Include the property and unit, your application, equipment and purchasing requirements. A calculation or another supplier’s catalogue does not establish a Newton product rating.
Frequently asked questions
Does “high strength” identify a complete specification?
No. Ask which property is required, its unit and reporting basis, and which grade and evidence are proposed.
Does one laboratory result approve every application?
It describes the tested sample and conditions. Decide separately which evidence is needed for the intended process and package.
Can a percentage replace the underlying results?
Keep both. A percentage without its numerator, denominator and comparison basis can hide what was actually measured.
Discuss your evidence requirements with Newton. Include the property and unit, application, equipment and the documents your purchasing process requires.
Sources and scope
Public references provide industry context. Other manufacturers’ specifications are not Newton approvals. Paid standards were not accessed in full.
- ASTM D3950-23 listing — Official standards directory; no Newton certification claim. Accessed 2026-10-14.
Connect this guide to your application
Use the product families below to start a specification review. Suitability and availability require confirmation for the proposed grade.
- Newton PET Strapping
- NewtonStrap - Ultra
- NewtonStrap - Ultra Max
- Steel application requirements
- Fiber application requirements
